Lifestyle Centers
Pose Tax Concerns
Should they be taxed on cost and design features?
Kenneth Rogers
As retail real estate evolves in response to changing demographics
and shopping patterns, new center formats have emerged during
the years, including lifestyle centers. However, lifestyle centers
have actually been around longer than their name. The first
such centers were built in the early 1980s, but they did not
receive great notice because they were overshadowed by the proliferation
of mall developments taking place during that time period. Now
that lifestyle center project starts outnumber enclosed mall
starts, this format is now viewed as the hot new trend.
In some respects, lifestyle centers combine the best elements
of the mall and the strip center, but they add their own unique
characteristics. The most important characteristic of a lifestyle
center is its orientation to the upscale specialty or lifestyle
retailer.
According to the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC),
a lifestyle retailer is one that caters to the lifestyles
and aspirations of millions of American households with sophisticated
tastes for clothing, home furnishings and décor, electronic
gadgetry and food, among other things. Further, the lifestyle
center is designed to provide an exciting shopping experience
that incorporates the best in store design, merchandise layout,
lighting, music, video and other in-store entertainment features.
Consumer research conducted by the ICSC on five representative
lifestyle centers found that the median household income of
the centers shoppers was $85,000. This figure compares
to a median household income of $45,000 for the United States
as a whole.
Lifestyle centers, in many cases, capture some of the feel of
the old main streets from the past. In addition to appealing
to a sense of nostalgia, they also offer some of the glamour
and excitement that is missing in many regional malls.
Lifestyle centers appear to have gained consumer acceptance
in almost every market where they have been built. While they
tend to draw from the best features of the mall and the strip
center, how should they be viewed from a real estate tax perspective?
Since real estate taxes are ad valorem, or according to the
value of the property taxed, a number of assessment challenges
arise.
Some of the valuation issues facing assessors are:
Lifestyle centers have high project costs. A lifestyle
center typically costs twice as much to develop as a strip center
and can cost more on a per-square-foot basis than a regional
mall. It is important to ask the question: Is a project always
worth what it costs to develop?
Lifestyle centers are risky. Because of their high unit
costs, feasibility rents are as high, or higher, than that of
a regional mall. However, mall rents at lifestyle centers may
not be sustainable because they lack the customer drawing power
of the fashion department stores that anchor malls.
Many assessing jurisdictions rely on building permit costs when
assessing lifestyle centers. As a result, it is important to
consider whether or not a property will sell for what it costs
to develop, especially before stabilization.
The emphasis on design, landscaping and amenities can give the
appearance of operational success and high property value. Costly
design features and amenities may actually represent an over-improvement
of the property relative to the cash flow generated by the project.
These factors should always be considered by lifestyle center
owners when evaluating their real estate tax assessments.
Kenneth Rogers is director of real estate analysis with
the Chicago law firm of Fisk Kart Katz and Regan Ltd., the
Illinois member of American Property Tax Counsel, the national
affiliation of property tax attorneys.
©2004 France Publications, Inc. Duplication
or reproduction of this article not permitted without authorization
from France Publications, Inc. For information on reprints
of this article contact Barbara
Sherer at (630) 554-6054.
|